The Wild & Scenic
Farmington River
Background
on the National Wild & Scenic Designation
Congress established the National Wild and Scenic
Rivers System in 1968 to protect certain outstanding rivers from
the harmful effects of new federal projects, such as dams, hydroelectric
facilities, bank armoring and bridges. To be considered "wild
and scenic," a river (or river segment) must be free-flowing
and have at least one outstanding natural, cultural, or recreational
feature. As of May, 1999, the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System
included 156 river segments covering nearly 11,000 miles. Of all
those rivers, only six are located in New England: the Allagash in
Maine; the Wildcat and Lamprey in New Hampshire; the Westfield in
Massachusetts; the Sudbury, Assabet and Concord Rivers in eastern
Massachusetts, and now, the Farmington.
Why
the Farmington River?
Local interest in special protections for the
Farmington River began in the early 1980's when the Metropolitan
District Commission (MDC), the utility supplying water to about 400,000
people of the greater Hartford area, proposed a diversion from existing
water supply and multiple-use reservoirs on the West Branch to augment
their supply. Local residents and town officials and the Farmington
River Watershed Association (FRWA) expressed concern that the proposed
withdrawal would impair the natural resources, and recreational and
scenic values of the river. Although the proposal was rejected in
a 1981 referendum of MDC member towns, concern about the project
lingered in the Farmington Valley. At the same time, many residents
were becoming alarmed at the increasing rate of development along
the river's banks and the threat that shoreline development would
pose to the natural integrity of the river.
In an attempt to address these concerns, the
FRWA and towns along the river requested assistance from the National
Park Service in 1982 to evaluate the significance of the river's
resources and recommend strategies for conserving and managing the
river. This initial study, finalized in 1984, concluded that the
Farmington River possessed a variety of significant resources, and
that both local residents and government officials were dedicated
to conserving river qualities. Furthermore, it was recognized that
land use and ownership along the Farmington River are significantly
different than those currently under federal management elsewhere.
As a result, the report's principal recommendation was to develop
a plan that would "establish a regional cooperative partnership
between all levels of government and private groups and individuals
to develop explicit and integrated policies for the future use and
management of the Farmington River corridor."
Federal
legislation was enacted to study the river
Building on the findings in the 1984 report
and with growing interest in adding federal protection to town and
state efforts, Connecticut Congresswoman Nancy Johnson introduced
legislation in 1984 to have the West Branch of the Farmington River
studied for inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic River System.
In addition to considering the river's qualification for inclusion
in the National System, this legislation was intended to stimulate
a cooperative planning process among river interests to conserve
the river's critical resources.
When Congresswoman Nancy Johnson and former
Senator Lowell Weicker, Jr., proposed this legislation, they clearly
proclaimed that federal land acquisition and management would not
be considered as a river conservation technique. Local efforts were
recognized in the Farmington Wild and Scenic Study River Final Report
dated May 1995 as the foundation for river protection: "It would
be inappropriate and largely ineffective for federal government to
provide permanent protection from adverse federally assisted water
resource projects offered through Wild and Scenic River designation
without assurances from the other river interests that they are committed
to doing their part to protect the river through their own authorities
and abilities." To get this type of commitment, all stakeholders,
including private landowners, town governments, state agencies and
private organizations had to show their interest, support and commitment
to river protection.
A number of actions were taken that demonstrated
the support of stakeholders for designation.
- Town meetings were held with votes of support
for designation taken.
- Town adoption of River Overlay Protection
Districts.
- Responses to questionnaires reflecting landowner
and resident support for river conservation were compiled (the
greatest perceived threats to the river were from water pollution,
growing population and commercial development; the activities to
be encouraged were water quality and flow protection, and wildlife
habitat, forest lands and scenic quality conservation).
- Workshops were held to promote voluntary
land conservation through conservation easements and other means.
- An instream flow and watershed yield study,
managed by the State of Connecticut and co-funded by the MDC and
National Park Service, was undertaken. This study was instrumental
in demonstrating that sufficient water existed in the West Branch
Farmington River watershed to support instream needs for the outstanding
natural resources, and recreational and scenic values of the river,
while providing up to 20 million gallons of water per day for public
consumption.
- The Connecticut State Legislature passed
public act 25-175 proclaiming its support for designation.
- The MDC, FRWA and State of Connecticut provided
substantial staff time to the development of the Study Report and
Management Plan.
- Many local, regional and national private
organizations supported designation. Specifically, the local organizations
including the FRWA, Farmington River Anglers Association, and the
Farmington River Club, advocated tirelessly for designation.
Designation
Occurs
Public Law 103-313 was signed by President Clinton
on August 26, 1994, designating a 14 mile portion of the Farmington
River in Connecticut as a component of the National Wild and Scenic
River System. Through this legislation, the outstanding natural resources,
and recreational and scenic values of the Farmington River will be
protected. Protection will be assured through town, state and federal
agencies, and private organizations and citizens as established in
the Upper Farmington River Management Plan. There is to be no federal
land acquisition.
A segment in Massachusetts was included in the
original study and was found eligible for inclusion. Local authorities
chose not to pursue designation at that time. That segment remains
eligible for inclusion in the National System, however. Should local
sentiment change, it too can be included with the Connecticut segment
in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.
|